Comments on: Solution to Viaduct More Committees, Committee Says

By: Ann

Ann — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:17:05 +0000

Maybe Tim Eyman has a few ideas… how do we get him on the next committee!!

By: Peter Selig

Peter Selig — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:55:00 +0000

I am from Boston. I think Seattle needs the BIG DIG!
23 Billion and still counting!

By: Jack LeCerveau

Jack LeCerveau — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:55:51 +0000

Let’s face it we are need of:
More attorneys and trial lawyers to be involved.
More consultants from Engineering and Consulting Firms.
More political consultants who can play the game
More tax dollars diverted to the tunnel program for more committees
More do nothing nothing nothing and nothing.

Besides the Tunnel will cause more CO2 and more global warming by having more cars. We should just shut down the viaduct.

By: JesseJB

JesseJB — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:44:32 +0000

I cant wait until we reach the need for a blue-ribbon commission!!!

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:50:22 +0000

I’m not convinced this is the right solution.

Did they consider bringing in consultants on the committee’s committee structure?

By: Patti

Patti — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:26:24 +0000

As non-action, non-decision, non-progress continues….