<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Screw Transportation Compromise, Seattle Should Ban Cars Outright	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/</link>
	<description>Puget Sound&#039;s Most Spectacular Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:47:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zoomie		</title>
		<link>https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoomie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedloon.com/opinion/2008/03/17/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/#comment-98</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[WOW!!!  What a babe!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!!  What a babe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulysses		</title>
		<link>https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulysses]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedloon.com/opinion/2008/03/17/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/#comment-85</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Methinks someone wants to be heard, seeing as the above comment was copied and pasted into two different articles...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks someone wants to be heard, seeing as the above comment was copied and pasted into two different articles&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marco		</title>
		<link>https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedloon.com/opinion/2008/03/17/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/#comment-69</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last week the paper noted how the City of Tacoma will consider taxing each of its residents $100 to drive the streets of our town.

&quot;A transportation benefit district allows a local government to create a new taxing district. It would be separate from the city, but still run by the local council. Among the taxing options are a $100 annual fee per vehicle, a 0.2 percent increase in the sales tax and a property tax levy.&quot;

No where does it talk about the city&#039;s obligation to carpool to work, buy hybrid vehicles, stop driving huge SUV&#039;s or take the bus to its own council meetings.

Does any city council member take the bus to their weekly Tuesday night meetings? I think not.

So before our famed council tries to pond more cash out of our tax strapped residents, try living by your green living recommendations. Otherwise, stop preaching to the over taxed citizens in telling us how to live a more carbon neutral life, when you yourselves do not adhere to your rhetoric.

This time Eyman is right. Citizens should vote for any tax increase that goes against the intentions of the $30 state car tab fee.

Otherwise, Tacoma residents will get screwed by this city council, again. You can count on it coffee talk fans.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/331/story/3303]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week the paper noted how the City of Tacoma will consider taxing each of its residents $100 to drive the streets of our town.</p>
<p>&#8220;A transportation benefit district allows a local government to create a new taxing district. It would be separate from the city, but still run by the local council. Among the taxing options are a $100 annual fee per vehicle, a 0.2 percent increase in the sales tax and a property tax levy.&#8221;</p>
<p>No where does it talk about the city&#8217;s obligation to carpool to work, buy hybrid vehicles, stop driving huge SUV&#8217;s or take the bus to its own council meetings.</p>
<p>Does any city council member take the bus to their weekly Tuesday night meetings? I think not.</p>
<p>So before our famed council tries to pond more cash out of our tax strapped residents, try living by your green living recommendations. Otherwise, stop preaching to the over taxed citizens in telling us how to live a more carbon neutral life, when you yourselves do not adhere to your rhetoric.</p>
<p>This time Eyman is right. Citizens should vote for any tax increase that goes against the intentions of the $30 state car tab fee.</p>
<p>Otherwise, Tacoma residents will get screwed by this city council, again. You can count on it coffee talk fans.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/331/story/3303" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.thenewstribune.com/331/story/3303</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patti		</title>
		<link>https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedloon.com/opinion/2008/03/17/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/#comment-45</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s scary is that much of this is true!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s scary is that much of this is true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OP		</title>
		<link>https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedloon.com/opinion/2008/03/17/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/#comment-42</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s scary is some people actually believe a lot of this!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s scary is some people actually believe a lot of this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karl Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://nakedloon.com/news/opinion/2008/04/01/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedloon.com/opinion/2008/03/17/screw-transportation-compromise-seattle-should-ban-cars-outright/#comment-23</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Leaving the Hiram Chittendon Locks open would also be a great idea, freeing up millions of tax dollars spent on maintenance of the locks and no fewer than 7 bridges. It would create a natural path to the Sound and create immediate, affordable housing on the former shore of Lake Washington and the former Mercer Island. This type of housing would be most beneficial to some of the larger families and extended families of our immigrant population.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving the Hiram Chittendon Locks open would also be a great idea, freeing up millions of tax dollars spent on maintenance of the locks and no fewer than 7 bridges. It would create a natural path to the Sound and create immediate, affordable housing on the former shore of Lake Washington and the former Mercer Island. This type of housing would be most beneficial to some of the larger families and extended families of our immigrant population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
